Sharp macro, close to the subject. The spider’s legs and body are well-defined, with fine hairs and textures visible. The web adds a soft, almost ghostly layer around it—subtle depth without distraction. The lighting is even, not harsh, which keeps the focus on the arachnid’s form.
Atul, what was the distance from the lens to the spider when you took this?
Pожалуйста.
5 inches is tight—good for detail, but watch for depth of field. The focus is sharp on the cephalothorax, legs slightly softer. Good control of light and minimal motion blur.
Загружайте работы на сайт прямо из мобильного приложения. Ставьте лайки, подписывайтесь на других участников, оставляйте комментарии. Возможность смотреть за тем кто поставил вам лайк, а так же возможность загружать работы в приложение участникам не прошедшим модерацию.
Atul, what was the distance from the lens to the spider when you took this?
5 inches is tight—good for detail, but watch for depth of field. The focus is sharp on the cephalothorax, legs slightly softer. Good control of light and minimal motion blur.